🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," stated one European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government committed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, action is primarily happening at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain politicians to follow this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, further countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and others show that governments globally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.