🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The latest limitations are being defended by referring to last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but perverts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its warfare have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for holding placards against mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our liberties. We may ultimately rue how easily we allowed them to be eroded.