🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.